Suppose Roe v. Wade is overturned. A recent fanfare of concern worries that a state would then be able to punish its citizens for traveling to other states to seek medical assistance in ending their pregnancies. Missouri is considering a statute that would do exactly that, and Texas activists are pushing a similar proposal. Other states may follow.
Would such a law be constitutional? It’s hard to be sure. The doctrine is a confusing mishmash, and the Supreme Court has declined to offer definitive guidance. Although legal scholars have been arguing since the 1990s in favor of a right to travel to seek an abortion, the last time the justices directly addressed the issue of a state’s power to punish crimes beyond its borders was … um … 1941.
In short, we can’t predict how a court would treat an effort by one state to bar its citizens from obtaining abortion in another. But one need not be pro-choice to see the strength of the argument against such a law.
Let’s start with a basic question: Can a state punish its citizens for breaking the state’s laws while beyond its boundaries? It would seem that
New abortion laws could see many women, doctors face criminal charges
rights, protest Supreme Court","hlsURL":"https://hlsmedia.gannett-cdn.com/authoring/video-renditions/ecd4a0a6-c1c6-453b-b716-9fb669837f9d/05e4699f-8cf8-4d84-9468-f7311683721e/1080p_30fps,720p_30fps,480p_30fps,master.m3u8?subtitles=9782679002","id":"9782679002","image":"url":"https://www.gannett-cdn.com/presto/2022/05/15/USAT/0b1998b4-14bc-449c-add5-c90fbf8f41f1-abortionprotests_deskthumb.png","opto":true,"initialPublishDate":"2022-05-15T01:13:28Z","keywords":"Abortion,Video Syndication – USAT,Video Syndication – OTT Platforms,Roe v. Wade,Supreme Court of the United States,Samuel Alito,Brett Kavanaugh,Amy Coney Barrett,Protests and Protesting","mp4URL":"https://downloadmedia.gannett-cdn.com/authoring/video-renditions/ecd4a0a6-c1c6-453b-b716-9fb669837f9d/05e4699f-8cf8-4d84-9468-f7311683721e/1080p_30fps.mp4","origin":"USA TODAY","pageURL":"long":"https://www.usatoday.com/videos/news/2022/05/15/abortion-rights-advocates-gather-nationwide-protest-supreme-court/9782679002/","promoBrief":"In cities across America, abortion-rights advocates gathered to protest the leaked Supreme Court draft opinion that would overturn Roe v. Wade.","propertyName":"USATODAY","publishDate":"2022-05-15T01:13:28Z","series":"","ssts":"section":"news","subsection":"","topic":"","subtopic":"","tags":["id":"24f9451b-006f-4dbb-be0a-d1379e7a8e83","name":"Abortion","id":"6f55135f-3b5e-490d-8a52-a3b8e1f11ee7","name":"Video Syndication – USAT","id":"16fe9f9b-4247-4e2e-a73c-9fac5b14d01b","name":"Video Syndication – OTT Platforms","id":"62c84ab2-fe3f-4420-ba35-615668774456","name":"Roe v. Wade","id":"a173914f-749b-454a-81ed-e37783d9c6f6","name":"Supreme Court of the United States","id":"1ce3e265-f604-4fbb-9e15-2e0be2c0f311","name":"Samuel Alito","id":"daf7f778-855c-4ece-9606-23d8137c77f9","name":"Brett Kavanaugh","id":"3d77fd6e-f13b-4e22-a192-377e266cb140","name":"Amy Coney Barrett","id":"423c0ee1-3844-49b6-a9aa-b5ab0ef6d370","name":"Protests and Protesting"],"title":"Abortion-rights advocates gather nationwide to protest Supreme Court","url":"/videos/news/2022/05/15/abortion-rights-advocates-gather-nationwide-protest-supreme-court/9782679002/"” aria-label=”Play video”
Period tracking apps, tele-health appointments, mail-in pharmacy requests and other data could be used as evidence in criminal cases for those involved in abortions, experts said.
States that have already passed laws redefining “personhood” to include an unborn child may mean people who seek out abortions or anyone helping them could face charges of feticide or aggravated assault, among other charges.
o date, more than 80 elected district attorneys and attorneys generals around the country, including in red states, have committed to using their discretion to not charge individuals or those who help them in ending a pregnancy should federal abortion rights be overturned.
How does a law firm differentiate itself from its competitors?
Start by building your brand.
Many lawyers and law firms know they should have a brand, but maybe you’re not clear on exactly what that means – or how to do it. We’re here to help. Keep reading to understand more about law firm brands and how to create one that reflects your firm’s unique culture.
1. Understand what brand means.
Lawyers learn many things in law school, but marketing and branding is not typically included. First things first . . .
What is law firm branding?
Your law firm brand is the collection of all elements you create to portray your firm’s personality and your promise to clients. A clearly defined law firm brand identifies the right tone for the firm, understands its current and aspirational perception in the market, and guides the creation of materials that effectively communicate who you are and what you do.
In short, your brand is the indelible impression you make upon your audience.
Lieke van der Velden, head of the firm’s corporate M&A group, and Sjoerd Meijer, head of the dispute resolution group, have been appointed as managing partners of NautaDutilh effective June 1, the firm has announced.
The two are joining Chris Warner on the board of management. The NautaDutilh board doesn’t have a chairman, instead operating as a collective.
Lieke van Der Velden joined the firm back in 1995, and was made a partner in 2005. She specialises in the financial sector, advising on international and domestic mergers and acquisitions. In 2016, she played an important role in the Vodafone and Liberty Global Netherlands merger,
Sjoerd Meijer joined NautaDutilh in 2008, and also became a partner in 2005. He advises and litigates in the areas of class action insurance and professional liability law, a practice which has seen exponential growth in the Netherlands over recent months.
Their predecessors, Jaap Jan Trommel and Petra Zijp who were appointed alongside Warner in 2017, will return to practice on a full-time basis.
In a statement by the firm, Chris Warner, congratulating the two on their appointment, said: “They are both leaders in their fields and genuinely nice
Spotlight PA is an independent, nonpartisan newsroom powered by The Philadelphia Inquirer in partnership with PennLive/The Patriot-News, TribLIVE/Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, and WITF Public Media. Sign up for our free newsletters.
HARRISBURG — While Pennsylvania voters might look to the General Assembly to take action on new gun laws after the massacre of nearly 20 children in Texas, the judiciary will likely determine the direction of the commonwealth’s firearms policies in the coming months.
Three distinct suits are being appealed to the state’s highest court, all arguing that cities and municipalities in Pennsylvania should be allowed to pass their own gun laws.
The suits — which involve the state’s two largest cities, Philadelphia and Pittsburgh — seek to either loosen or overturn a nearly three-decade-old precedent that gives the legislature the sole authority to regulate gun ownership throughout the state.
Advocates for and against stricter gun policies in Pennsylvania say court action could have broad consequences. In one of the cases involving Philadelphia, the state Supreme Court is being asked to strike down as unconstitutional a 1995 law that preempts local jurisdictions from enacting stricter gun regulations — which could in turn force the legislature to rewrite it.
